The article critique portion of the class stood out to me the most!
·
Research Design
o
Hypotheses based on type of government
(conservative, social-democratic, liberal)—interesting they used regime versus
government
o
Looked at indicators of
participation and other indicators—seeing if it is grouped by government type
o
Where they got the date from is
under the results section—from 2008 OECD Education—supplemented
with other information/data-- countries reported what wanted to, a lot of
missing observations
·
Findings
o
Conservative regimes expanded
less than liberal regimes
§
Same pattern with graduation
rates
o
Policy makers should make
decisions based on regime
§
Why do they have to do
that? Wouldn't they do that naturally?
§
How can they change outcomes if
they’re only making policies based on your regime
·
Discussion/Conclusion
o
Useful that it was with four
policy makers instead of one….multiple lenses
o
Interesting—sample age is
25-64—why so large?
o
Quote on page 22- why low
achiever?? Does this mean tracking….
§
Conservative—people have their
proper place I society—46
§
More extensive tracking….more
money and resources
§
What about Fowler models….
o
Framework analysis helps with
framing for article critiques
§
Also look at leadership and
power—how are they being used
Take away from Article Discussion
·
You can always poke-- I really liked this language :)
·
Can always cite Fowler and Smirch/Morgan—this
will become second nature as you come along
o
Weick also with sense making
o
There is a cast of characters
that you can start citing along the way
·
Soon—you will be able to see
holes in anything and be able to increase your own writing
As you get more practice with critiquing, you'll find you can't read anything without doing this! There are always problems with studies and writings. You can also keep this in mind as you write up your own research. Think about how you are now finding a set of favorite articles--these will stick with you over time!
ReplyDelete